![]() ![]() Either we choose what the popes have taught for centuries and we choose the Church or we choose what was said by the Council. That is why, personally, I do not believe that the declarations of the Council on liberty of conscience, liberty of thought, and liberty of religion can be compatible with what the popes taught in the past. This is the way it is you either believe it or you don’t, of course, but when you believe, then you have to draw the consequences. One only has to read them the same applies for Pope Pius IX and Pope Gregory XVI.Īgain, all of this is based on the Church’s fundamental principles, on the fact that the Church is truth, the only truth. Leo XIII wrote long encyclicals on the subject. ![]() When the Popes condemned liberty of thought, liberty of conscience, liberty of religions, they explained why they condemned them. But the doctrine of the Church is the doctrine of the Church. Naturally, in our time of liberalism many people cannot understand that we can defend opinions that can seem "outdated," "antiquated," "mediaeval," etc. Religious Liberty Questioned by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre The Angelus Press also offers Catholic books on various topics : Pfeiffer’s review on The Liturgical Movement ![]() STK# 7071 Color softcover, photographs, index. How did the magnificent first-fruits of this great enterprise, which could have brought so much good to the Church, go so awfully bad?įar from being negative, The Liturgical Movement helps us to know what to reject and what we must carefully conserve of the Liturgical Movement, above all for those who work for the maintenance of the Catholic Liturgy as heirs and successors of the work of Dom Gueranger and Pope Saint Pius X. The Liturgical Movement shows how since before Vatican II, the New Mass had already been conceived –the poisoned fruit of the perversions of the Liturgical Movement. *In the end, who hijacked the Movement to propagandize for Vatican II and a New Mass?įind out who were the major players hounding the Popes of the era: Beauduin, Bea, Parsch, Guardini, Casel, Jungmann, Lercaro, Botte, Reinhold, Winzen, Congar, Harscouet, (Gaspar) Lefebvre, Danielou, Fischer, Bugnini, Nocent, Bouyer, Thurian, Gy, etc. *What was the principal error of these liturgical radicals? *Who made up the brain-trust which led its early deviation? The Liturgical Movement is a fast-reading book on the history of the Liturgical Movement of the last century. ![]() The Novus Ordo derived from the thought of Dom Guéranger and Pope Saint Pius X?! No way! Didier Bonneterre, a French SSPX priestĬertainly, historically Dom Guéranger and Pope Saint Pius X are truly at the origin of the Liturgical Movement, that is, "the renewal of fervor for the liturgy among the clergy and the faithful." But it is a false and pernicious claim that there has been a "homogenous development" in the Movement begun by them resulting in the New Order of Mass! This Lenten season invites us to make a special effort to read Catholic literature.The Angelus Press has recently published an English translation of The Liturgical Movement, by Rev. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |